Korean Journal of Sport Science

Search

Close

J Korean Neurol Assoc. 2001;19(6):585-591.
"Estimating the Validity of the Korean Version of Expanded Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Scale"
"Seong Hye Choi, M.D.*, Duk L. Na, M.D., Byung Hwa Lee, M.A., Dong-Seog Hahm, M.D.† ,Jee Hyang Jeong, M.D., Soo Jin Yoon, M.D., Kyung Hee Yoo, M.A.†,Choong-Kun Ha, M.D.*, Il-Woo Han, M.D.†, Dementia Research Group"
"Department of Neurology*, Inha University College of Medicine Department of Neurology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Yongin Hyoja Geriatric Hospital†"
한국판 Expanded Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)척도의 타당도
최성혜, 나덕렬 이병화 함동석†정지향 윤수진 유경희†하충건*한일우†치매연구회(부록1 )
인하대학교 의과대학 신경과*,성균관대학교 의과대학 신경과,용인효자병원 신경과†
Abstract
Background
: The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale is broadly accepted by clinicians as a staging measure for dementia. The aim of this study was to test inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the Korean version of the CDR. Methods : Participants included 34 persons without dementia and 41 patients with Alzheimer’s disease, and 37 patients with vascular dementia. The participants and their informed collateral sources were interviewed by a rater using a semistructured clinical interview. To obtain concurrent validity, all the participants received K-MMSE, K-SKT (Syndrom Kurz Test), and a 15-items abbreviated K-BNT on the same day. We also tested inter-rater reliability among four raters using a videotape design. Results : Agreements of the overall CDR ratings (κ, 0.86-1.0) and Sum of Boxes of CDR (CDR-SB) (γ, 0.89-1.0) by the four raters were high. Both global CDR and CDR-SB correlated significantly with K-MMSE, K-SKT and the abbreviated K-BNT. The Orientation and Memory box score correlated significantly with orientation and memory scores of K-MMSE. Conclusions : The Korean version of CDR appears to be a reliable and valid tool as a staging measure for Korean dementia patients. Key Words : Dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, Vascular dementia

Keywords :
초록

Go to Top